This project modernizes and consolidates two Procter & Gamble (P&G) Corporate Packaging Prototype Development groups into a leased pre-engineered warehouse/distribution facility. The expansive warehouse bays were good for changeable open shops and assembly areas while allowing material labs and offices to be located efficiently.
The 125,000-sf facility included a "main street" with "think tank" facilities and other common space for meeting and greeting. Additionally, display space is provided to accommodate team information showing goals, progress and opportunities.
Capacity is for 160 personnel.
BHDP provided full architectural service from study of options through start-up. All P&G goals for the space and project were exceeded.
Main mechanical and electrical runs were added. Electrical capacity was substantially increased. Sprinklers were added and relocated for the new occupancy. Alarms were added per code. ADA upgrades were included throughout. Heating and cooling systems were substantially modified.
Most flooring was hard surface with commercial carpet tile used in the office and meeting rooms. Partitions were drywall, and office furniture was modular. New ergonomic chairs were provided. Lighting was new throughout. New interior glass and glazing was prominent. New attractive and functional coatings were provided throughout.
| Building Owner: |
 |
The Procter & Gamble Company |
 |
|
Owner Contact:
|
|
Robert Wipperman, Associate Director Corporate Facilities Engineering
|
 |
|
Building Location:
|
|
Cincinnati, OH UNITED STATES
|
 |
|
Project Type:
|
|
New Construction,Renovation
|
 |
|
Principal Building Function:
|
|
Packaging Development Labs |
 |
|
Project Delivery Method:
|
|
Construction Management
|
 |
|
Project Timeline
|
|
| Sep 1997 | Planning Start |
| Nov 1997 | Design Start |
| Feb 1998 | Construction Start |
| Oct 1998 | Completion |
|
Last known status: Completed
|
|
 |
| Project Cost: |
|
$10,400,000 |
| Construction Cost: |
|
$7,600,000 |
| Cost Per Sq. Ft: |
|
$61 |
|
|
About These Cost Figures
|
 |
|
Project Includes:
|
|
Conference Room
Dining
Laboratory
Office
R&D
|
| Total GSF: |
|
125,000 |
| Total NSF: |
|
100,000 |
| Efficiency: |
|
80% |
 |
|
Building Population:
|
|
160
|
|
People Density:
|
|
780 gsf/person
|
|
Building Services:
|
|
Conventional M&E, fire protection, voice and data communications, N2, compressed air
|
|
Special Equip:
|
|
Special packaging equipment
|
|
Office Size:
|
|
6' x 6' NSF
|
|
HVAC Req:
|
|
Roof top Zone Units
|
 |
|
Lab Module:
|
|
12' x 20'
|
|
Casework Mat'l:
|
|
?Lista? Brand Benches with Oak Tops.
|
|
Fume Hoods:
|
|
8
|
|
Biosafety Cabinets:
|
|
Under Hood Cabinet for Flammables
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Profile Created 04/18/2002 |
| Last Updated 04/04/2006 |
 |
 |
The cost figures reported are supplied by the firms that submitted these
projects for publication, which in most cases are the designers or builders.
Whereas these sources are intimately familiar with their projects, they may
not be fully aware of the owners' finally-realized and recorded costs. In some
cases, costs are truly and completely accounted for, and in others they represent
a near approximation of the final costs. Costs have not been adjusted for
year of construction, nor has any attempt been made to make regional cost
adjustments.
Further, costs are not comparable on any kind of detailed standard costing model.
Hence, it is possible for the cost of one building to include a steam boiler, while
the cost of a comparable building might not include the boiler, if steam is being
supplied from an already existing campus grid. Or, in another case, a building might
include excess boiler capacity to supply steam to another building. Some submittals
include fees or unusual site improvements as part of the construction costs, which
others do not.
|
|