Eli Lilly and Company's $52-million renovation of a five-story, 425,000-sf building houses new lab and research support areas for teams of scientists. Originally built as an automobile manufacturing plant in the 1920s, the renovation and construction of 40,000 sf of new space, converted existing lab, storage and cafeteria space into new state-of-the-art laboratories and formulation areas for more than 400 researchers and staff.

 Nearly every lab unit can be appropriate for nearly any project without significant refit of space due to a minimum of fixed casework. Placing the emphasis on moveable tables and shelving with overhead utility service columns allows the labs to be configured in a myriad of ways. Modular formulation areas near the labs bring bench scale development and pilot scale development into one facility. The formulation labs are used by any of the research teams for development studies up to and including production of clinical trial material.

The primary challenge of the 600-foot long building was air distribution, both supply and exhaust. Without consuming large amounts of floor area or creating too many separate systems, two new large HVAC chases are placed at the ends of the building where air supply fans, ductwork and exhaust fans are located.

Exterior renovations consist of an all-new precast concrete skin and window system to update its appearance and, most importantly, to provide a weather-tight overcladding for the existing aging concrete frames. New stair towers and a five story atrium added to the building provide circulation and interaction areas to reinforce the notion of a synergistic, team-oriented workplace. The interior, likewise, reinforces team interaction with copy centers, conference rooms, coffee stations and a deli concentrated at the center of the building to coax people into places where chance meetings become commonplace.

 

Project Information
Building Owner:		Eli Lilly and Company
Owner Contact:		Fritz Frommeyer or Dave Needler, Facilities Delivery Engineering
Building Location:		Indianapolis, IN UNITED STATES
Project Type:		New Construction,Renovation
Principal Building Function:		Development labs for pharmaceutical products
Project Delivery Method:		Fast Track
Project Timeline		Apr 1994 Planning Start Jul 1994 Design Start Apr 1995 Construction Start Oct 1996 Completion Last known status: Completed
Project Cost:		$53,000,000
Construction Cost:		$40,000,000
Cost Per Sq. Ft:		$133
		About These Cost Figures
Building Information
Project Includes:		Laboratory: Dry And Wet Office Pilot Plant Product Development R&D
Total GSF:		425,000
Total NSF:		190,282
Efficiency:		62%
Building Population:		450
People Density:		944 gsf/person
Building Services:		Vacuum, compressed air, N2,house vacuum, process hot and cold water, 30 psi steam, potable H&C H2O
Special Equip:		NMRs, LC Mass Spectrometers, GC Mass Spectrometers, FTIR, Fluid Bed Dryers, Coating Pans, Tray Dryer, Environmental Chambers, Lyophilizers, Atomic Absorber, Spectrophotometer, Electron Microscopes, Robotics
Office Size:		144/120/64 NSF
Power Req:		24.30 total watts/nsf
HVAC Req:		2 cfm/nsf
Structure/Foundation:		Existing structure
Laboratory Parameters
Casework Mat'l:		Metal; mixture of fixed and movable tables; movable and adjustable shelving systems
Fume Hoods:		75, 5'hoods three 6' hoods two 8' walk-ins
Biosafety Cabinets:		16, 6' class II, type B2
Project Team
Architect		Flad Architects
Builder		Shiel Sexton
Builder		BMW
Builder		Ermco
Consultant		Affiliated Engineers Inc. (AEI)
Supplier - Biosafety Cabinets		NUAIRE Inc.
Supplier - Building Automation Controls		Johnson Controls Inc.
Supplier - Casework		Norlab
Supplier - Fume Hoods		Norlab
Supplier - Furniture		Fisher Hamilton
Supplier - HVAC		Bright Sheet Metal
Supplier - Laboratory Equipment		Inter Metro Industries Corp.
Profile Created 11/01/1997
Last Updated 04/04/2006
About the Reported Cost Figures The cost figures reported are supplied by the firms that submitted these projects for publication, which in most cases are the designers or builders. Whereas these sources are intimately familiar with their projects, they may not be fully aware of the owners' finally-realized and recorded costs. In some cases, costs are truly and completely accounted for, and in others they represent a near approximation of the final costs. Costs have not been adjusted for year of construction, nor has any attempt been made to make regional cost adjustments. Further, costs are not comparable on any kind of detailed standard costing model. Hence, it is possible for the cost of one building to include a steam boiler, while the cost of a comparable building might not include the boiler, if steam is being supplied from an already existing campus grid. Or, in another case, a building might include excess boiler capacity to supply steam to another building. Some submittals include fees or unusual site improvements as part of the construction costs, which others do not.

We welcome your Questions and Comments

Copyright 2008 Tradeline Inc.
All Rights Reserved
ISSN: 1096-4894