![]() |
![]() |
Pitfalls of Biocontainment Facility Projects and How to Avoid ThemExpert Says More Than Half of all Biocontainment Labs are Incorrectly Constructed Published July 2007 Too many multimillion-dollar biocontainment facilities built around the world are not immediately usable due to faulty design and construction. Tony Della-Porta, managing director of Biosecurity & Biocontainment International Consultants, suggests that the best way to succeed in building a safe, functional, easily serviced facility is to include lab users, along with building management and maintenance staff, as part of the design team. The team must work together to supervise the construction and purchase proper biocontaining equipment.“More than 50 percent of the labs I have inspected are incorrectly constructed,” says Della-Porta. “There are serious problems associated with these facilities, including design pitfalls, non-compliance with regulations, incorrect biocontainment requirements, and poorly supervised construction.” Knowing how and for what purpose the facility will be used enables the design team to seek out and adhere to the proper regulations. Determining potential risks prevents them from happening. “If you don’t identify the hazards, then you can’t design systems to make sure you protect against them,” says Della-Porta. Workflow analysis can help ensure that worker needs will be met. Keep in mind that animal research facilities have additional requirements. “You need to know how you get the staff, equipment, and materials in and out. If you don’t work that out at the beginning, you will find that the facility won’t work,” he points out. Equipment should be suitable for biocontainment purposes and easy to access, service, and remove for decontamination. Decontamination chambers are recommended for BSL-3 facilities containing more than one laboratory, so that equipment can be decontaminated across the containment barrier for servicing and to allow for entry of new equipment and large items. Autoclaves must be serviceable from the outside, rather than from the secure side. Ultracentrifuges should have a HEPA filter between the chamber and the vacuum pump. The plant must not be built in a secure area. Costly cleanroom-designed equipment should not be selected because it does not fulfill biocontainment requirements. Place as much serviceable equipment outside of the secure area as possible to help cut back on potential contamination and unnecessary personnel entrances. “The more equipment outside the contained area, the better,” says Della-Porta. “This allows the engineering staff to service the equipment without going into the facility.” Rooms must be properly sealed with coving, and designs should take into account changeable and/or extreme climates. During design and after construction, workers should be instructed in proper use of the facilities. Airlocks are not for storage. Hands-free sinks must be truly hands-free and used after every use of the biological safety cabinet and every time the laboratory is exited. Photo Gallery This report will illustrate and examine instances of pitfall occurrences and suggest how to prevent against them.
Description: This large airlock at the University of Hong Kong features air inflatable door seals that are flush with the floor.
Description: Hands-free sinks are required at the exit of the laboratory.
Description: This ceiling is collapsing due to higher negative air pressures than the materials can resist.
Description: Terminal HEPA filters.
Description: Exhaust HEPA filters are mounted just above the floor underneath a biological safety cabinet. Description: This boiler is mounted too high, with a burst disk near the top.
Description: Room humidity and cool air temperature causes condensation of water on non-stainless-steel pipes, causing rust.
Description: This laboratory is properly designed.
Description: Unsealed floor without coving.
Description: Properly sealed double-ended bioseal autoclave. Summary The purpose can often change as the animals, equipment, and staff in a facility change. It is important to determine the anticipated hours of use per week of a facility before building. A facility that operates 24/7 cannot be fumigated entirely. Compartments must be created in which systematic fumigation can then occur. Decontamination facilitates the safe removal of equipment without the need to close down the facility. Engineers and architects must work closely with project managers and other staff during planning and construction to prevent the common pitfalls of building a biocontainment facility. One facility that already passed its containment tests required the installation of exit signs as noted by the safety committee. Without the proper supervision and adherence to quality finishes, exit signs were mounted in the walls breaking the containment barrier, costing the facility its containment status. “It is absolutely critical to get these things right,” stresses Della-Porta. “If the changes are not implemented properly the facility no longer works as it was designed.” By Michael Fegel |
Circulate to:
[ ] [ ] [ ] Biography Tony Della-Porta worked more than 30 years for Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in the fields of virology, infectious diseases of livestock, biocontainment, and biological safety. He served as program manager and deputy head of the Animal Health Laboratory in Geelong. He is now the managing director of Biosecurity & Biocontainment International Consultants. This report is based on a presentation given by Della-Porta at the Tradeline 2007 International Conference on Biocontainment Facilities held in March. For more information Tony Della-Porta, FASM, BSc, PhD, FASM GAICD Find this report valuable? Notes:The majority of Tradeline's Exclusive Reports evolve from sessions at one of Tradeline's facilities planning and management conferences. Click here for a list of upcoming conferences and see what data you could benefit from first hand. |
Copyright 2008 Tradeline Inc. All Rights Reserved ISSN: 1096-4894 | |