Tradeline, Inc. | Leading-edge resources for facilities planning and management www.tradelineinc.com

Design and Equipment Selection Critical for Aerosolization Facilities

Integration of Proper Equipment and Architecture Maintains Safety and Security

Published August 2007

Designing complex animal aerosolization facilities that provide an effective research environment with the highest level of safety is a difficult task requiring a collaborative team effort. It is essential to have early and comprehensive involvement between the architect, engineers, principal investigators, and the biological safety officer, who plays a vital role in the design and operation of the facility.

The biological safety officer is responsible for tracking every aspect of science in the facility, including the incoming and outgoing materials, personnel, and animals to ensure that movement between various biocontainment levels can occur seamlessly with the proper protocols and procedures to minimize accidental exposure to harmful pathogens.

“It is important to have an integrated building where safety is combined with facility design, standards of practice, and the necessary scientific equipment to provide a safe and productive research environment,” says Robert DeGenova, an associate principal at Hillier Architecture in Princeton, N.J. “There is a lot of fact-finding and preparation required to design these very complex facilities and it starts with understanding the type of research that will be conducted in the building.”

Architectural Design Considerations

The most suitable design for aerosolization facilities can be planned only after a thorough risk assessment is performed. A detailed analysis is necessary to determine the type of Select Agents that will be handled in the facility, the level of risk, and the size and species of animals to be housed in the building. The answers to these questions will be used to determine the procedures and protocols that must be implemented to ensure safety and emergency preparedness for all potential hazards. The hazards are evaluated based on the likelihood that a problem may occur and the consequences that would result.

Designing multi-pathogen facilities that house multiple species requires the use of specific protocols for different animals and the type of research being conducted. Documented SOPs reduce the potential for exposure to humans, animals, and  the environment, while preventing cross-contamination between the different kinds of research taking place in the building. Detailed requirements must be outlined to ensure that all individuals working in the facility understand the importance of safety procedures, operational standards, personal protective equipment, and engineering protocols.

“We want scientific results that are reliable because the proper protocols are in place,” says DeGenova. “Where possible, we rely upon proven experience. We are pleased that the research community is open and collaborative so we can learn from each other’s successes and failures.”

Being prepared to safely handle multiple pathogens and to effectively deal with emergencies can be achieved by preparing a detailed checklist defining the following:

• agents (form, concentrations, and expected manipulations),
• animal models,
• expected toxic chemicals and/or radiation use,
• people, materials, and animal flow issues, including the transport of hazardous materials into the facility and hazardous waste out of the facility,
• potential risks, threats, probabilities, and consequences,
• required engineering controls, and
• special ventilation, plumbing, and electrical needs.

Adhering to the highest safety standards is especially important when working in BSL-3 facilities because exposure can lead to illness or death, treatments for exposure to certain pathogens are limited, and there is the potential for the disease to spread by splash, spray, or aerosol accidents. Measures must be taken to prevent employee exposure and the release of any aerosol within or outside the facility.

“There has been an explosion of understanding of what constitutes BSL-3. In response to emerging needs and health risks, BSL-3 has become the big box for a lot of pathogens,” says DeGenova. “The threat of diseases, such as Mad Cow Disease, is worldwide. Tuberculosis is also re-emerging and older drug therapies may not be effective.”

Equipment Solutions

Most of the new biocontainment laboratories have dedicated lab space to perform aerosolization research, working with a range of animals from mice to non-human primates. Safe and effective ways to address the hazards associated with the aerosolization of animals have been developed.

Taking certain steps before selecting equipment ensures the successful operation of a high-containment aerosolization facility.

“The first thing we tell our people is to get input from the end users to determine their needs,” advises Mark Zarembo, the custom products division manager at the Baker Co. in Sanford, Maine. “They may need something special located in the glovebox and they need different configurations depending on the type of research they are doing. Any of the manufacturers selected for Class III equipment will need to know these things at the beginning of the project.”

Building an integrated facility can be done much more smoothly when input is also obtained from biosafety officers, the architects, the HVAC engineers, maintenance people, and those who will be handling the animals. Talking to other researchers who have used aerosolization equipment in the past is a good idea to determine what works well and what does not. Gathering the necessary information will ensure the building is equipped with the best solutions and offers the maximum operating efficiency and highest level of safety.

Be sure to consider what will be located in the space around the equipment and whether the HVAC capabilities are sufficient. Decontamination protocols should be in place for each piece of equipment. Since much of the equipment consists of large, gas-tight structures, it is essential to ensure the units can be moved from the loading docks into the laboratory without being compromised.

“We have had cases where the equipment had to be hauled up to the eighth floor through an elevator shaft, so be careful about the selection,” says Zarembo. “Consider the path and the way to get the equipment into the building. You also have to consider equipment lead time and the reality of when the equipment will be available to researchers.”

Once equipment is installed, it must be certified prior to use and this is typically done by a qualified, independent third party. Testing should include the HEPA filter leak test, which requires special instrumentation, special knowledge, and special procedures. HVAC balance must be tested to ensure proper pressurization and to verify that alarms are operating properly. All ancillary equipment should be checked to guarantee top operating performance.

Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Considerations

There are numerous functional and technical criteria that must be met as part of the HVAC design requirements for the aerosolization suites, according to Allan Ames, a principal at Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers in Watertown, Mass. The suite is typically divided into three or four zones (anteroom, holding room, and aerosol challenge room) with an HVAC system capable of providing 15 to 20 air changes per hour. The supply is 100 percent outside air with 100 percent exhaust. The AHU and exhaust fans require redundant units to ensure that there is no unintentional shutdown during operation. A Class III device like the glovebox requires two HEPA filters in series per NIH standards. One filter is located on the glovebox and the other is typically located remotely, possibly in the interstitial space, so maintenance personnel can access it using proper protocols.

Animal holding rooms contain microisolator racks with direct exhaust and thimble connections. Each room in the aerosolization suite is a pressurization zone with interlocking doors and electronic pressurization monitoring systems. All exhaust ductwork serving the suite is welded stainless steel. A general exhaust outlet in the ceiling is required to help ventilate the aerosol challenge room and holding rooms.

The Class III glovebox has a low-volume (200 CFM), high-static exhaust connection. This can be mitigated by having the glovebox manufacturer supply an integral booster fan with the equipment. These would be run in series with the main exhaust fans. Two low-flow, high-static exhaust fans (one primary and one standby) in parallel located in the interstitial are required per NIH standards to exhaust the glovebox to atmosphere.

The design of the BSL-3 rooms includes constant volume supply and exhaust with hot water reheat valves, proof of proper air pressure and temperature at each room, individual exhaust connections to each rack, supply HEPA filters at each cage rack, a decontamination sequence, and special software programs for data collection, alarm management, and alarm notification.

Air flow is important when considering the necessary decontamination sequence. At the Duke University Global Health Research Building there is a wall separating the Class II glovebox with a BSL-2 biological safety cabinet in the passthrough into the Class III glovebox. Generally, the air flows from the corridor into the anteroom, into the holding room, and then into the aerosolization suite.

It is important to understand the efficacy and risks associated with decontaminating one room versus all of the rooms at the same time in order to develop decontamination protocols. Can each room be safely isolated and decontaminated without the decontamination gasses entering the adjacent rooms? The design must consider the location of bubble-tight dampers, whether redundant HEPA filters are needed, and budgetary concerns.

The gloveboxes at Duke have a separate exhaust going to a filter containment box and then the individual rooms have separate exhausts from the biosafety cabinets and holding cubicles. On the supply side, each room is separated with the anteroom and the autoclave having their own supply zone.

Ductwork in aerosolization facilities is very dense and is typically located in an interstitial space. Abundant mechanical space is necessary to provide service personnel with ample room to repair and maintain the equipment. Hard ceilings with no access panels are a good choice to prevent contamination, so alternative access to the piping and ductwork is necessary.

“You have to think about all of the failure scenarios and decontamination scenarios and make sure the sequences are built into the control system,” says Ames. “We had quite a bit of discussion about that with the maintenance people. Everyone must work together to design the safest, most technologically sophisticated, and effective environment to achieve the desired outcome.”

By Tracy Carbasho

Circulate to:

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

Biographies

Allen Ames, a principal at Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers, has more than 25 years of experience in the field of HVAC engineering. As a principal at the firm, he has been heavily involved in the engineering of HVAC systems for a broad range of projects for academic, research, science, and health care clients nationwide. He received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Massachusetts in 1981. He has worked on numerous projects, including the Cancer Research Facility at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Regional Biocontainment Laboratory at both George Mason University and Duke University, and the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mass.

Robert DeGenova is a 13-year veteran of Hillier Architecture where he is an associate principal in the Sci-Tech practice group. His expertise in the programming and planning of research laboratories impacts an array of projects, including the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, the Duke University/NUS Graduate School of Medicine, and the UMDNJ University Hospital Cancer Center. He holds a bachelor’s degree in architecture from the New Jersey Institute of Technology and is a registered architect in New Jersey. He is an ad hoc adviser to the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources.

Mark Zarembo is the custom products division manager at the Baker Co., where he has worked since 1991. While Baker is known primarily as an inventor and leading manufacturer of Class II biological safety cabinets, Zarembo leads a group of engineers and designers who concentrate on specialty high-containment applications where the use of Class III gloveboxes is typically indicated. He has more than 14 years of experience working with researchers, architects, biosafety officers, and other instrument manufacturers who are designing buildings and working with some of the world’s deadliest biological and chemical agents.

This report is based upon a presentation given by Ames, DeGenova, and Zarembo at the Tradeline 2007 International Conference on Biocontainment Facilities in March.




For more information

Allan Ames, P.E.
Principal
Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers 
311 Arsenal St.
Watertown, Mass. 02472
(617) 254-0016
aa@brplusa.com

Robert DeGenova, RA
Associate Principal
Hillier Architecture
500 Alexander Park CN23
Princeton, N.J. 08543-0023
(609) 452-8888
rdegenova@hillier.com

Mark Zarembo
Custom Products Manager
The Baker Co.
P.O. Drawer E
Sanford, Maine 04073
(207) 324-8773
mzarembo@bakerco.com




Holding Rooms

Animal holding rooms in aerosolization facilities include individual exhaust connections to each rack and supply HEPA filters at each rack. (Photo courtesy of Hillier Architecture.)




Interstitial Space

Ductwork in aerosolization facilities is very dense and is typically located in an interstitial space. Abundant mechanical space is necessary to provide service personnel with ample room to repair and maintain the equipment. (Photo courtesy of Hillier Architecture.)




Find this report valuable?

The majority of Tradeline's Exclusive Reports evolve from sessions at one of Tradeline's facilities planning and management conferences. Click here for a list of upcoming conferences and see what data you could benefit from first hand.

Notes:














Copyright 2008 Tradeline Inc.
All Rights Reserved
ISSN: 1096-4894