Latest Reports

The Shared Resource Center, which will provide new lab space for four existing core facilities at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute in Tampa, Fla., is nearing completion with substantial buy-in from staff, despite a sometimes challenging consensus-building process, according to Moffitt’s Christine O’Connell, senior director of laboratory research operations and Susan Constable, manager of shared resources.

Framingham State University, part of the University of Massachusetts system, has added 58,000 sf of new laboratory space to the Hemenway science complex in the middle of campus. Hemenway Laboratories, a five-story addition with a basement mechanical level, houses 16 teaching labs serving organic, inorganic, analytical, and physical chemistry; food science; and the biological sciences of human anatomy and physiology, microbiology, intro biology, comparative anatomy, ecology/ornithology, biomarine organisms, zoology, and cell biology/genetics.

Decreases in energy and commodity prices have driven growth and pricing increases in the non-residential construction market and other sectors of the economy. Year-over-year non-residential construction growth is currently at 25 percent. Combined with a total volume growth of 17 percent in 2014, the sector is approaching a 52 percent rebound in spending from its most recent bottom. Price increases for 2015 are trending toward 8 percent, depending on location.

Motivating organizational leadership to address the growing limitations of aging science facilities can be a challenge for facility managers. Strategic assessment models like facility condition, revitalization rate, and asset age are powerful tools for stewarding facilities, but in advocating for renewal, which models are most likely to drive action? Officials at NASA considered four of the most common models before settling on the use of a simple “readiness” metric for measuring operational risk and developing a reasonable business case for new facility investment.

The phrase “lab of the future” typically refers to a flexible, open floorplan designed to promote collaboration and cross-pollination between researchers. But these buzzwords have been used for decades, with open labs dating back to the mid-’60s and flexible casework to the mid-’80s. So how successful have these features been, and what defines the lab of the future in 2015 and beyond?