Skip to main content

Event Schedule

Sunday, October 4, 2026

Time Event Location
7:30 – 8:00 AM Pre-Conference Course Registration/Breakfast
  • Registration Sign-in/Continental Breakfast for Fundamentals Course Legends C
    Details

    Registration for the Fundamentals Course attendees.

    View session page

8:00 AM – 4:30 PM Pre-Conference Course
  • Fundamentals of Planning and Design of University Science and Engineering Facilities Legends C
    • Russell M. Chernoff, Architect AIBC, MAAA | Chernoff Thompson Architects
    • Tim Reynolds, PE | Treanor
    • Naomi F. Gross, Architect AIBC, AAA, AAPEI, MRAIC, LEED AP | Chernoff Thompson Architects
    • Kelley Cramm, PE, LEED AP BD+C | Henderson Engineers
    Details

    What you will learn: This course covers the basic elements of planning and design of labs and facilities for teaching and research – upfront planning and programming, teaching lab designs, active learning space designs, informal learning space designs, research lab designs, building design, and planning for mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and lighting systems components. Participants will come away with a basic understanding of the terminology, concepts, processes, standards, numbers, and types of labs, scientific equipment, and furniture (as applicable) involved in teaching and research facility planning and design. The course also serves as primer for the two-day conference that follows and will be highly interactive with Q&A throughout.

    Who should attend: This one-day course is open to all who have interest in lab planning and design: project managers, facility planners and managers, lab managers, architects, engineers, construction engineers, faculty, researchers, and scientists employed at colleges and universities, and A/E/C firms.

    Space is limited and enrollment is subject to approval.

    Cost:
    $1,375 Fundamentals Course only
    $1,100 with registration to two-day conference immediately following

    (Fees include course materials, continental breakfast, refreshment breaks, lunch)

    View session page

5:45 – 7:30 PM Speakers Dinner/Briefing
  • Speaker Orientation Meeting & Dinner Legends B
    Details

    This meeting is intended for presenters only, and is a critical part of the Tradeline program. Your group will be given last minute information on the audience and their special questions as well as project information relative to this topic. Also covered will be conference protocol and audio-visual equipment for presenters, as well as details on the conference schedule. Speakers will receive a full set of conference materials at this time.

    Advanced RSVP Required

    View session page

7:30 – 8:30 PM Welcome Reception
  • Hosted Welcome Reception (Guests Welcome) Legends Foyer
    Details

    Join us for a hosted beer and wine bar along with light snacks.

    Attendees may sign-in and pick up their registration materials here, or the next morning at the conference ballroom foyer.

    Guests welcome.

    View session page

Monday, October 5, 2026

Time Event Location
8:00 – 8:30 AM Registration Sign-In/Continental Breakfast
  • Registration Sign-in/Continental Breakfast
8:00 AM – 5:45 PM Exhibit Booths Open
8:30 – 9:30 AM Plenary Sessions
  • 8:30 – 8:55 AM A blueprint for scale-up: Planning and design lessons from NLR’s flagship energy materials facility
    • Bret Cummock, PE, PMP, DBIA | National Laboratory of the Rockies
    Details

    Many research institutions face the gap between laboratory discovery and commercial-scale adoption in advanced manufacturing, energy storage, and polymers. Bret Cummock draws on NLR's Energy Materials and Processing at Scale (EMAPS) facility —a 127,000-square-foot, $224 million flagship building now under construction—to share design evolutions and infrastructure decisions behind a next-generation scale-up research environment. He describes the flexible configurations supporting rapid reconfiguration and industry collaboration, how pilot-scale processing bridges bench research to commercial production, and how electrification and reclaimed water systems advance decarbonization targets. He highlights a range of best-in-class features to inform emerging science capital initiatives at any scale.

    View session page

  • 9:05 – 9:30 AM Engineering discovery: New program priorities and design rationales at UT Austin
    • Brent Stringfellow | The University of Texas at Austin
    Details

    As universities push to grow engineering capacity and attract top talent, new facilities must serve specialized research while enabling cross-disciplinary collaboration. Brent Stringfellow demonstrates how evolving institutional priorities shaped key planning and design decisions in a new 210,000-square-foot engineering research and teaching facility housing two departments. He illustrates how the seven-story research tower and student-centered pavilion were configured to serve distinct programmatic goals while connecting faculty, graduate researchers, and undergraduates, and how advanced research can overlap with and enrich the undergraduate experience. He describes rationales behind advanced lab features, flexible configurations, multi-program integration, and targeted outcomes, and explains how this project completed an engineering district plan redefining how research is conducted in the Cockrell School of Engineering. He delivers key lessons learned on distinguishing characteristics and strategies instructive to other institutions planning and programming multi-department engineering research facilities.

    View session page

9:35 – 9:55 AM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
9:55 – 10:50 AM Plenary Sessions
  • 9:55 – 10:20 AM Urban advantage: Lessons learned in leveraging location to create innovation engines
    • Maey Khaled | NYU Tandon School od Engineering
    • Michael O'Neill | NYU Tandon School of Engineering
    Details

    Don’t let your campus strategy treat location as a constraint — in today’s research landscape, breakthroughs don’t just come from funding or talent, they come from ecosystems. This session presents a candid, execution-focused look at how NYU Tandon School of Engineering has turned New York City’s density, proximity, and transit access into measurable drivers of research growth. Drawing on real-world capital projects in a high-intensity urban environment, Maey Khaled and Michael O'Neill deliver a data-driven framework for integrating location intelligence into capital project prioritization, vertical planning, adaptive reuse, and shared infrastructure. They outline a replicable playbook to assess campus positioning, align facilities investments with research ROI, and convert location from a fixed constraint into a competitive advantage. 

    View session page

  • 10:25 – 10:50 AM Post-occupancy evidence: Turning researcher feedback into facility strategy
    • Barbara Manley-Smith, BS, MHL | Augusta University
    Details

    Modern research buildings can deliver everything they promise on opening day and still constrain science through invisible operational pressures. Barbara Manley-Smith profiles Augusta University's post-occupancy study of a newly built, light-filled research facility, drawing on survey responses from faculty, staff, postdocs, graduate students, and undergraduates. She details what the modern environment achieved in collaboration, visibility, and shared-resource use, and pinpoints recurring constraints around lab storage, bench and wall space, equipment support, lab-office adjacency, environmental comfort, odors, and maintenance reliability. She maps how post-occupancy findings directly shape planning, infrastructure, and operations decisions for next-generation research facilities.

    View session page

10:55 – 11:10 AM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
11:10 AM – 12:05 PM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum B: Next-gen research environments: Lessons from AI and data science hubs
    • Dave F. Meaney | University of Pennsylvania
    • Andrew Herdeg, FAIA | Lake Flato Architects
    • Petar Mattioni, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB | KSS Architects
    Details

    Artificial intelligence and data science are driving a fundamental rethinking of academic research facilities, shifting from individual PI labs toward collaborative research neighborhoods optimized for fluid team structures and shared computational infrastructure. This session examines next-generation facility models and lab typologies through Amy Gutmann Hall at the University of Pennsylvania, an interdisciplinary hub for AI and data science programs, alongside peer benchmark comparisons. Presenters explore how open lab environments, transparent collaboration zones, shared computational infrastructure, and material systems including mass timber support both collective exchange and focused individual work. They deliver post-occupancy insights that translate directly into actionable planning guidance for future projects.

    View session page

  • Forum C: Building the Quantum future: Designing Cornell’s Duffield Complex for ECE and Quantum Information Science
    • William Voulgaris, AIA | NBBJ
    • Erin Mulrooney | Cornell University
    • Thomas E King | Cornell University
    Details

    As quantum information science emerges as a defining research frontier, universities are reimagining engineering facilities to support both established and emerging disciplines within unified, flexible environments. This session presents Cornell University’s Duffield Hall Expansion, which transforms two existing buildings into a cohesive complex housing the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, a state-of-the-art Quantum Information Science Technology (QIST) research facility, and strong programmatic connections to Cornell’s NanoScale Facility and Bowers College of Computing and Information Science. Presenters explore design strategies for flexible shared quantum labs, adaptable instructional spaces, and spatial connections that reinforce interdisciplinary collaboration across one of the nation’s leading engineering programs. 

    View session page

  • Forum A: Convergence by design: Metrics-based planning for integrated data science and hardware engineering facilities
    • Brian Tucker, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BC+C | Stantec
    • Rebecca Ross, AIA | Stantec
    Details

    As computing and engineering curricula converge, universities face mounting pressure to create facilities that seamlessly integrate software development, robotics, data science, embedded systems, and advanced manufacturing, often within a single building or floor plate. This session presents a curriculum-driven, metrics-based planning framework for designing academic environments that unite computing-centered spaces with hardware-intensive labs. Stantec planners draw on quantitative and qualitative metrics covering space allocation, adjacencies, infrastructure capacity, utilization, and flexibility to translate academic requirements into actionable facility decisions. Through project case studies, they evaluate and contrast renovation-versus-new-construction tradeoffs, risk management strategies, and design approaches that future-proof computing and engineering education facilities.

    View session page

12:05 – 1:05 PM Day 1 Lunch
Conference Ballroom
1:10 – 2:05 PM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum D: Raising the bar for successful next-gen science & engineering facility projects
    • John G. Lewis, Assoc. AIA | Research Facilities Design (RFD)
    • Michael J. Davison, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP | Research Facilities Design (RFD)
    Details

    To attract high-caliber talent, institutions are reimagining the campus experience to bridge the gap between recruitment and enhanced learning outcomes. Critical to these efforts are cross-discipline convergence, student-centered experiential learning, and enabling collaboration. In this session, RFD presents trends, planning solutions and benchmarking studies for next generation science and engineering facilities, including design considerations for biophilic laboratory spaces. They outline key decisions to best leverage complex systems inherent to laboratory focused facilities, and review valuable “lessons learned.” They will also detail examples from recently completed and ‘on-the-boards’ projects from across the United States, and highlight design strategies for planning successful laboratory facilities that provide active and collaborative environments for learning and discovery.

    View session page

  • Forum E: The impact of quantum computing and AI on science & engineering research facilities
    • Meredith Hayes-Gordon, AIA | HGA Architects and Engineers
    • Samir Y. Srouji, AIA, LEED AP | HGA Architects and Engineers
    • Lindsay Lake-Hefner, AIA, MBA | Michigan State University
    Details

    Quantum computing and artificial intelligence are rapidly transforming higher education research and the facilities that support it. Quantum systems demand specialized infrastructure including cryogenic environments and electromagnetic shielding, while AI research drives demand for flexible computational hubs and high-performance data infrastructure. This session examines how leading R1 institutions are designing convergence facilities that bridge the digital and physical domains. Using Michigan State University’s Leinweber Center for Engineering and Digital Innovation as a primary case study, presenters explore how cleanrooms, flexible laboratories, digital learning environments, and industry partnership spaces can be integrated to support quantum computing, AI, and advanced materials research within a single adaptive facility.

    View session page

  • Forum F: Building the future of discovery: Caltech’s scalable model for convergent research
    • Punit Jain | Cannon Design
    • Eugene Kim | Caltech
    Details

    Funding agencies mandate interdisciplinary collaboration, institutional commitments require aggressive decarbonization, and researchers demand adaptable spaces that keep pace with rapidly evolving science. This session reveals how the Resnick Sustainability Center addresses all three imperatives through integrated design-build execution, mass timber innovation, and flexible lab typologies that dismantle disciplinary silos. Presenters map actionable strategies for achieving measurable embodied carbon reductions, designing adaptable research modules that respond to evolving science, and creating transparent, collaborative environments that accelerate discovery-to-impact timelines. They chart new metrics for space utilization and collaboration effectiveness, demonstrate how progressive sustainability targets drive operational excellence, and provide a replicable blueprint for institutions pursuing convergent research models. They distill lessons learned on aligning stakeholder vision with performance outcomes and illustrate how strategic facility investments generate campus-wide ripple effects—empowering attendees to champion next-generation research environments.

    View session page

2:05 – 2:20 PM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
2:20 – 3:15 PM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum H: A decade in the making: Leadership, adaptability, and delivery of FSU’s interdisciplinary research and commercialization building
    • Mary Jo Spector, AIA, LEED AP BD+C | Florida State University
    • Dennis Renders, LEED AP BD+C | The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
    • Joseph Gibbons | HGA
    Details

    What does it take to deliver a major research facility when funding gaps, a global pandemic, and institutional uncertainty stretch a project timeline over a decade? This session traces Florida State University’s Interdisciplinary Research and Commercialization Building from concept in 2013 to construction completion, examining the leadership and persistence required to maintain momentum. Perspectives from FSU’s project management team, HGA Architects, and Whiting-Turner reveal how the project accommodated evolving user needs including a late-added Quantum Sciences program, and how a complex, technically demanding research facility was successfully delivered in a smaller regional market with limited specialized trade resources. 

    View session page

  • Forum I: Designing STEAM hubs as engines of innovation, recruitment, and economic impact
    • Grace Johnson | Advent
    • Eric Kunnen | Grand Valley State University
    Details

    As AI and robotics reshape academic programs, science and engineering facilities must evolve into high-performing strategic assets that attract talent, drive investment, and catalyze regional growth. This session profiles Grand Valley State University’s Blue Dot Lab, a multidisciplinary STEAM innovation hub that embeds an experiential infrastructure layer bridging architecture, technology, and storytelling. Presenters illustrate how adaptable collision spaces blend teaching, research, and industry production for long-term facility relevance; how high-tech environments drive recruitment and donor engagement; and how co-locating student entrepreneurship with computing hubs transforms a campus building into a powerful catalyst for real-world innovation and measurable economic investment.

    View session page

  • Forum G: USC Ginsburg Hall’s Living Lab blueprint for AI, robotics, and net-zero computing
    • Tim O'Connell, AIA, LEED AP | HOK
    • Paul Woolford, FAIA, IIDA, LEED AP BD+C | HOK
    • Nenad Medvidović | University of Southern California
    Details

    USC’s Ginsburg Human-Centered Computation Hall redefines what an AI and computing research facility can deliver functionally and programmatically, and this session draws out best practices to inform similar initiatives. Presenters examine the LEED Platinum Living Lab pairing purpose-built spaces and immersive environments across multiple disciplines — an indoor drone aviary, advanced robotics labs, and fabrication studios — with a passive-first, net-zero-ready envelope. They illustrate the use of a digital twin platform to transform building systems into active research and teaching instruments. They demonstrate how data-driven stakeholder programming unified the Department of Computer Science and the School of Advanced Computing, rounding out USC’s engineering district cluster in strategic interdisciplinary interactive spaces.

    View session page

3:15 – 3:45 PM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
3:45 – 4:40 PM Plenary Sessions
  • 3:45 – 4:15 PM The 80/20 lab renovation model: Faster research-ready space without new construction
    • Bruce Molino | SWBR
    Details

    Research institutions face mounting pressure to expand STEM research capacity as capital budgets shrink and deferred maintenance backlogs grow. Bruce Molino draws on experience leading facility planning at Syracuse University and in private practice to present the 80/20 lab renovation model, a proven framework that standardizes lab infrastructure decisions to shorten planning and delivery timelines. He shares how the process structures faculty engagement, minimizes custom design iterations, and maximizes adaptability within existing buildings. He describes implementation strategies and principles that balance institutional standards with research flexibility. He delivers key distinguishing characteristics and strategies for other institutions expanding research capacity through targeted renovation.

    View session page

4:45 – 5:45 PM Reception

Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Time Event Location
7:15 AM – 3:40 PM Exhibits Open
7:15 – 8:00 AM Hosted Breakfast
8:05 – 9:00 AM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum J: Mass timber and performance: A data-driven framework for low-carbon, high-performance research facility design
    • Benjamin Kroll | RDG Planning & Design
    • Nick Schulz | RDG Planning & Design
    • Steph Guy, P.E., F.AEI, LEED AP | Alvine Engineering
    Details

    Research facilities rank among the most energy-intensive building types, making them critical proving grounds for sustainable design innovation. This session presents the University of Michigan College of Pharmacy as a case study in integrating hybrid mass timber construction with advanced energy systems to achieve ambitious carbon and performance goals. Session leaders demonstrate how defining clear project drivers, including operational and embodied carbon reduction, user wellbeing, constructability, and cost, enabled systematic data-driven evaluation of every design decision. They examine results of a facility life-cycle assessment: A 40 percent reduction in embodied carbon through the timber structural strategy, while optimized facade design, heat recovery, chilled beams, and high-efficiency laboratory ventilation delivered substantial operational energy savings. 

    View session page

  • Forum K: How AI & data management are transforming science & engineering facility projects
    • Tyler Dykes, PE, LEED AP | Affiliated Engineers (AEI)
    • Bob Sherman, PE, LEED AP | Affiliated Engineers (AEI)
    Details

    AEC firms accumulate decades of design data from science and engineering facility projects, yet much of this institutional knowledge remains locked in tribal expertise and disconnected files. This session explores how Affiliated Engineers (AEI) has formalized a data management program that unlocks nearly 50 years of project history to improve decision-making across the entire facility lifecycle, from programming through post-occupancy. Presenters demonstrate how AI and machine learning tools are being integrated into design, construction, and building automation workflows to reduce costs, optimize performance, improve resource utilization, and advance decarbonization goals for high-performance science, engineering, robotics, and applied research facilities.

    View session page

  • Forum L: Closing the coordination gap: Aligning recruitment, operations, and facilities planning
    • Bruce Molino | SWBR
    Details

    At many research universities, activities connecting faculty hiring, lab development, research operations, and equipment planning span multiple units yet lack integrated governance, creating gaps that delay projects, strain capital resources, and misalign facilities with institutional priorities. This interactive, facilitated session invites participants to map their coordination processes, surface common challenges, and collectively build a shared model for how research facilities are planned and delivered. Drawing on a proven workshop framework and an implemented institutional example, Bruce Molino guides attendees in identifying actionable opportunities to improve alignment, clarify governance structures, and make more effective use of capital resources in support of institutional research priorities. 

    View session page

9:00 – 9:15 AM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
9:15 – 10:10 AM Plenary Sessions
  • 9:15 – 10:05 AM Building through uncertainty: Forecasting construction costs in a tariff-volatile economy
    • James Vermeulen, LEED AP, PQS | Vermeulens, Boston
    • Mike Khatib | Vermeulens, Atlanta
    Details

    Tariff volatility, shifting Federal Reserve policy, and turbulent construction materials markets are forcing facility owners to fundamentally rethink cost planning. This session delivers a rigorous, data-driven analysis of construction cost escalation drivers including trends in labor productivity, key commodities such as steel, copper, lumber, and oil, and macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, equity markets, and employment. The Vermeulens team presents its construction labor weather map to identify regional cost pressure zones and multi-scenario forecasts for the next two years. Attendees will leave with actionable frameworks for setting contingencies, calibrating escalation assumptions, and managing capital planning risk in an unpredictable economic environment.

    View session page

10:10 – 10:35 AM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
10:35 – 11:30 AM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum N: University of Arkansas’ groundbreaking semiconductor fabrication facility
    • Nestor Camargo | University of Arkansas
    • Caleb Tyson, AIA | WDD Architects
    • Steven Karl, PE, LEED AP BD+C | Vanderweil Engineers
    Details

    The University of Arkansas’ Multi-User Silicon Carbide Research and Fabrication Laboratory is a landmark achievement in national semiconductor strategy, the only openly accessible silicon carbide fabrication facility in the United States. This session presents the collaborative design process behind this 22,000 sq. ft. facility, exploring how the architect, engineer, and university team balanced industrial-grade cleanroom requirements with an academic campus context and a commitment to educational transparency. Presenters illustrate how 6,500 sq. ft. of cleanroom processing space was integrated alongside open-access prototyping areas, how safety and security requirements were reconciled with visibility, and how flexible design features accommodate diverse semiconductor fabrication workflows.

    View session page

  • Forum A: Convergence by design: Metrics-based planning for integrated data science and hardware engineering facilities
    • Brian Tucker, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BC+C | Stantec
    • Rebecca Ross, AIA | Stantec
    Details

    As computing and engineering curricula converge, universities face mounting pressure to create facilities that seamlessly integrate software development, robotics, data science, embedded systems, and advanced manufacturing, often within a single building or floor plate. This session presents a curriculum-driven, metrics-based planning framework for designing academic environments that unite computing-centered spaces with hardware-intensive labs. Stantec planners draw on quantitative and qualitative metrics covering space allocation, adjacencies, infrastructure capacity, utilization, and flexibility to translate academic requirements into actionable facility decisions. Through project case studies, they evaluate and contrast renovation-versus-new-construction tradeoffs, risk management strategies, and design approaches that future-proof computing and engineering education facilities.

    View session page

  • Forum M: Transforming legacy STEM facilities for tomorrow’s data science, robotics, and engineering programs
    • David Shaffer, AIA | RATIO Design
    • Divya Choudhary, PhD | Indiana State University
    • Tyler Claypool | Garmong Construction
    Details

    This session lays out the roadmap for modernizing legacy facilities to deliver competitive 21st-century learning environments and support high-growth programs. In this case study of a transformation of a 40-year-old STEM facility at Indiana State University, session leaders document achievements in improved accessibility and collaboration, and providing future-ready environments for data science, robotics, and engineering. They illustrate high-value investments in "learning on display" that foster transparency and interdisciplinary engagement, and reimagined lab environments to support modern teaching, research, and flexibility across multiple STEM programs in one building.

    View session page

11:30 – 11:45 AM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
11:45 AM – 12:40 PM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum D: Raising the bar for successful next-gen science & engineering facility projects
    • John G. Lewis, Assoc. AIA | Research Facilities Design (RFD)
    • Michael J. Davison, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP | Research Facilities Design (RFD)
    Details

    To attract high-caliber talent, institutions are reimagining the campus experience to bridge the gap between recruitment and enhanced learning outcomes. Critical to these efforts are cross-discipline convergence, student-centered experiential learning, and enabling collaboration. In this session, RFD presents trends, planning solutions and benchmarking studies for next generation science and engineering facilities, including design considerations for biophilic laboratory spaces. They outline key decisions to best leverage complex systems inherent to laboratory focused facilities, and review valuable “lessons learned.” They will also detail examples from recently completed and ‘on-the-boards’ projects from across the United States, and highlight design strategies for planning successful laboratory facilities that provide active and collaborative environments for learning and discovery.

    View session page

  • Forum B: Next-gen research environments: Lessons from AI and data science hubs
    • Dave F. Meaney | University of Pennsylvania
    • Andrew Herdeg, FAIA | Lake Flato Architects
    • Petar Mattioni, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB | KSS Architects
    Details

    Artificial intelligence and data science are driving a fundamental rethinking of academic research facilities, shifting from individual PI labs toward collaborative research neighborhoods optimized for fluid team structures and shared computational infrastructure. This session examines next-generation facility models and lab typologies through Amy Gutmann Hall at the University of Pennsylvania, an interdisciplinary hub for AI and data science programs, alongside peer benchmark comparisons. Presenters explore how open lab environments, transparent collaboration zones, shared computational infrastructure, and material systems including mass timber support both collective exchange and focused individual work. They deliver post-occupancy insights that translate directly into actionable planning guidance for future projects.

    View session page

  • Forum O: Science on display: Core labs as catalysts for collaboration and innovation
    • Vlad Pajkic | ZGF Architects
    • Lia Peacock | ZGF Architects
    Details

    Science and engineering facilities are increasingly expected to do more than house research—they must activate community engagement, accelerate interdisciplinary exchange, and make innovation visible to a broader community. Presenters draw on projects at UC Davis and Oregon State University to show how core labs can be repositioned from isolated service functions into visible, connective infrastructure that activates public space. They share design strategies for integrating public-facing ground floors, maker spaces, co-working labs, and shared cores, and describe how mass timber construction supports research performance and community identity. They deliver key distinguishing characteristics and strategies for other institutions building innovation cultures.

    View session page

12:40 – 1:40 PM Refreshment Break Ballroom
1:45 – 2:40 PM Concurrent Sessions
  • Forum E: The impact of quantum computing and AI on science & engineering research facilities
    • Meredith Hayes-Gordon, AIA | HGA Architects and Engineers
    • Samir Y. Srouji, AIA, LEED AP | HGA Architects and Engineers
    • Lindsay Lake-Hefner, AIA, MBA | Michigan State University
    Details

    Quantum computing and artificial intelligence are rapidly transforming higher education research and the facilities that support it. Quantum systems demand specialized infrastructure including cryogenic environments and electromagnetic shielding, while AI research drives demand for flexible computational hubs and high-performance data infrastructure. This session examines how leading R1 institutions are designing convergence facilities that bridge the digital and physical domains. Using Michigan State University’s Leinweber Center for Engineering and Digital Innovation as a primary case study, presenters explore how cleanrooms, flexible laboratories, digital learning environments, and industry partnership spaces can be integrated to support quantum computing, AI, and advanced materials research within a single adaptive facility.

    View session page

  • Forum G: USC Ginsburg Hall’s Living Lab blueprint for AI, robotics, and net-zero computing
    • Tim O'Connell, AIA, LEED AP | HOK
    • Paul Woolford, FAIA, IIDA, LEED AP BD+C | HOK
    • Nenad Medvidović | University of Southern California
    Details

    USC’s Ginsburg Human-Centered Computation Hall redefines what an AI and computing research facility can deliver functionally and programmatically, and this session draws out best practices to inform similar initiatives. Presenters examine the LEED Platinum Living Lab pairing purpose-built spaces and immersive environments across multiple disciplines — an indoor drone aviary, advanced robotics labs, and fabrication studios — with a passive-first, net-zero-ready envelope. They illustrate the use of a digital twin platform to transform building systems into active research and teaching instruments. They demonstrate how data-driven stakeholder programming unified the Department of Computer Science and the School of Advanced Computing, rounding out USC’s engineering district cluster in strategic interdisciplinary interactive spaces.

    View session page

2:40 – 2:55 PM Refreshment Break Ballroom Foyer
2:55 – 3:40 PM Concluding Session
  • 2:55 – 3:45 PM Open Forum / Town Hall Meeting
    • Derek Westfall | Tradeline, Inc.
    • Bruce Molino | SWBR
    Details

    This end-of-day session is where key ideas, new developments, and findings that have been revealed over the course of the entire two-day conference (including sessions you may have missed) get clarified, expanded upon, and affirmed or debated. This is also the opportunity to get answers from industry leaders and the entire audience to specific questions on key and challenging issues.  

    View session page

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

Time Event Location
8:00 AM – 12:00 PM Tour #1
  • Vanderbilt Science & Engineering Facilities Tour
    Details

    Wednesday, October 7th
    8:15AM - Participants check-in in hotel lobby, and load the bus including any luggage
    8:30AM - Bus departs
    8:45AM - Bus arrives at Vanderbilt University for a two hour tour
    11:30AM - Bus departs Vanderbilt University to Nashville International Airport (BNA)
    12:00PM - Bus drops passengers at Nashville International Airport 
    12:30PM - Bus returns to Omni hotel

    A $50 transportation fee will be added to the conference registration cost for this optional tour.

    View session page